Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Hills v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Case Number:
3:17-cv-00556
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 24, 2023
AT&T Settles Bias Suit Over Pregnancy-Related Absences
AT&T agreed to end a former salesperson's suit claiming she was disciplined and fired because of company policies that penalize absences related to pregnancy, according to filings in Indiana federal court.
-
September 19, 2022
Ex-AT&T Worker Denied Early Win In Pregnancy Bias Row
An Indiana federal judge refused to give a quick win to a former AT&T salesperson who said she lost her job because of company policies that penalize absences related to pregnancy, saying that AT&T never granted her an accommodation because she didn't ask for one.
-
July 22, 2021
AT&T, Worker's Attys Dinged For Combative Briefs In Bias Suit
A federal judge in Indiana admonished the legal teams behind AT&T's mobile phone subsidiary and a fired employee on Thursday for taking a "vituperative tone" in their briefs in a pregnancy discrimination suit and stymieing case progress with "unprofessional conduct."
-
May 14, 2018
AT&T Biased Against Pregnant Sales Staff, Ex-Workers Say
Two former employees of AT&T's mobile phone subsidiary have accused it of discriminating against pregnant retail store employees by having a companywide policy that penalizes them for absences or lateness related to pregnancy or childbirth, according to court papers filed Monday.