Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Grant and Eisenhoffer, P.A. v. Beverly Brown et al
Case Number:
2:17-cv-05968
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 23, 2018
Grant & Eisenhofer Not Entitled To $31M Fee, Ex-Client Says
A former Grant & Eisenhofer PA client told a California federal judge on Monday the firm can't take a $31 million cut of her settlement in a False Claims Act suit against Celgene Corp., arguing the firm's contingency agreement stopped applying when she fired the firm.
-
August 11, 2017
Grant & Eisenhofer Claims $7M In Fees Owed From FCA Deal
Grant & Eisenhofer PA sued Bienert Miller & Katzman PLC, Richard Harpootlian PA and an ex-client in California federal court Thursday, claiming that it is owed $7 million in fees plus a cut of a $280 million settlement reached in a qui tam False Claims Suit against Celgene Corp.