Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
QUARASHI v. M&T BANK CORP. et al
Case Number:
3:17-cv-06675
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 05, 2017
NJ Man Defends Rep Suitability In Force-Placed Coverage Suit
A New Jersey homeowner accusing M&T Bank Corp. of taking kickbacks for forced-place American Security Insurance Co. policies on Monday slammed the insurer's contention that he can't represent a proposed nationwide class, telling a federal judge that a standing argument belongs at the class certification stage.
-
November 06, 2017
M&T Seeks Quick Exit From Force-Placed Coverage Suit
M&T Bank Corp. on Monday asked a New Jersey federal court to dismiss a putative class action accusing it of taking kickbacks for forced-place insurance policies, saying that the named plaintiff's failure to take out proper insurance on his mortgaged property left him with no grounds to sue over the policy the bank took out for him.