Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
September 26, 2017
Carl Zeiss AG et al v. Nikon Corporation et al
Case Number:
2:17-cv-07083
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Fish & Richardson
- Foster Murphy
- Heim Payne
- Hunton Andrews
- Irell & Manella
- Minamino Law Office
- Morrison Foerster
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Perkins Coie
- Susman Godfrey
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
December 18, 2018
Nikon Cameras Don't Infringe Zeiss, ASML Patents, Jury Says
A California federal jury has found that Nikon Corp. did not infringe camera sensor patents jointly owned by lens maker Carl Zeiss and semiconductor maker ASML, allowing the Japanese camera giant to dodge damages of up to nearly $24 million.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login