October 20, 2017

WESCOTT ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY

Track this case

Case Number:

2:17-cv-04718

Court:

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Other

Judge:

GENE E.K. PRATTER

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity


Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.


Coverage

  1. March 09, 2018

    Insured's Ignorance Of Grace Period's End No Excuse: Judge

    A Pennsylvania federal judge ruled Thursday that Cincinnati Insurance Co. needn't pay more than $100,000 to Wescott Electric Co. in connection with a decadelong, multimillion-dollar employee theft, saying that, in the string of policies Wescott bought, it should have known of the eventual discontinuation of a one-year grace period for claims reporting.


Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!