Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
N.F. et al v. Microsoft Corporation Welfare Plan et al
Case Number:
2:17-cv-01889
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 06, 2018
Microsoft Can't Dodge Suit On 'Wilderness Program' Exclusion
A Washington federal judge found Tuesday that an exclusion for "wilderness programs" in a Microsoft Corp. health plan didn't doom a 16-year-old's proposed class action alleging the company wrongly denied coverage for mental health and substance abuse treatment, though he tossed the youth's breach of fiduciary duty claims.
-
May 02, 2018
Teen Fights Bid To Nix Microsoft 'Wilderness Program' Suit
A 16-year-old asked a Washington federal court not to throw out his proposed class action that alleges Microsoft Corp's health plan improperly denied coverage for mental health and addiction therapy called "wilderness programs," saying the plan's language forced it to cover medically necessary treatment from licensed providers.
-
April 03, 2018
Microsoft Seeks Toss Of 'Wilderness Program' Coverage Suit
Microsoft Corp. told a Washington federal court Monday that a putative class action asserting its health care plan improperly denied coverage of certain treatment services called "wilderness programs" should be tossed, arguing the plaintiffs had flipped their argument and were ignoring the plan's plain language.