Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Rogers et al v. Wilmington Trust Company
Case Number:
1:18-cv-00116
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 21, 2023
Judge Rejects Trust Co.'s $3.5M Award Bid After Del. Trial Win
A federal judge on Monday refused to grant a trust company's $3.5 million fee request after a trial win, because the company was "protecting its own interests" and didn't act responsibly.
-
August 19, 2022
Wilmington Trust Seeks $3.5M Award After Del. Trial Win
Wilmington Trust Company is seeking roughly $3.5 million in attorney fees and costs after a post-trial win in a suit that had sought up to $19.5 million in damages for alleged breaches of trust, fraud, elder abuse and investment adviser rule violations.
-
February 25, 2021
Wilmington Trust Beats $19.5M Beneficiary Suit After Trial
Wilmington Trust Co. beat all claims Thursday lodged against it by a trustee and a California woman who originally alleged as much as $19.5 million in damages through breaches of trust, fraud, elder abuse and investment adviser rule violations.
-
September 24, 2019
Del. Judge Pans Magistrate's Opinion But Accepts Conclusion
A Delaware federal judge late Monday branded a magistrate judge's rationale for rejecting a Wilmington Trust Co. bid for partial dismissal of a trust beneficiary's suit seeking more than $19.5 million in damages as "speculative and incorrect," but nevertheless kept the case alive.