Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
In Re Big Heart Pet Brands Litigation
Case Number:
4:18-cv-00861
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Andrews & Thornton
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Gustafson Gluek
- Keller Postman
- Lite DePalma
- Lockridge Grindal
- Napoli Shkolnik
- Wexler Boley
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 28, 2021
Smuckers Unit Trims But Can't Beat Tainted Pet Food Suit
A California federal judge on Tuesday trimmed consumers' putative class actions against a J.M. Smucker Co. unit that sold pet food containing a sedative, finding that the unit must face claims that the food labels were false or misled consumers.
-
March 01, 2019
Smuckers Unit Says Its Recall Nixes Tainted Pet Food Suits
A J.M. Smucker Co. unit that sold pet food containing a sedative used in euthanasia urged a California federal judge Friday to toss consumers' putative class actions, arguing the contamination problem has been addressed by a voluntary recall and new testing policies.