Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
April 05, 2018
In re: Polaris Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
Case Number:
0:18-cv-00939
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Baron & Budd
- Beasley Allen
- Carter Wolden
- Chestnut Cambronne
- DiCello Levitt
- Faegre Drinker
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Levin Sedran
- Lockridge Grindal
- McEwen & Kestner
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
February 27, 2020
Polaris Ducks Defect Claims From 'No Fire' Off-Road Drivers
Drivers of recreational off-road vehicles that didn't catch fire due to an alleged heat defect can't sue Polaris Industries Inc. in a proposed class action, a Minnesota federal judge has ruled, saying they hadn't claimed any facts about the defect appearing in their vehicles.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login