Figueroa v. Capital One, N.A. et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

3:18-cv-00692

Court:

California Southern

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Jeffrey T. Miller

Firms

  1. January 22, 2021

    Capital One Customers Land Final OK On $13M ATM Fees Deal

    A federal judge in San Diego gave final approval to a $13 million settlement between Capitol One NA and consumers who allege the bank unfairly charged them balance inquiry fees.

  2. December 04, 2020

    Capital One Customers Eye Approval On $13M ATM Fees Deal

    Capital One customers on Thursday asked a California federal judge to approve their $13 million settlement with the bank, a deal that would put to rest their claims that it charges surprising fees for ATM transactions.

  3. October 08, 2019

    Capital One Can't Get Quick Win In Suit Over ATM Fees

    A California federal judge ruled Tuesday that the terms of Capital One's customer contracts are too ambiguous for him to grant the banking giant a quick win on a suit that claims it charges surprise fees for ATM interactions.

  4. April 10, 2018

    Capital One Hit With Proposed Class Action Over ATM Fees

    Customers have slapped Capital One NA with a proposed class action in California federal court, accusing the bank of charging fees on its own ATMs that are supposed to be fee-free and charging excessive fees on other out-of-network ATMs.