Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Zhu et al v. CIGNA Corporation et al
Case Number:
3:18-cv-01029
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 06, 2018
Class Action Accusing Cigna Of Collusion May Move To Philly
Cigna, American Health Systems and the customers suing the two asked a California federal judge Thursday to move their case to an eastern Pennsylvania court, where attorneys are coordinating similar lawsuits that also accuse Cigna of adding AHS charges to customers' bills as if they were medical expenses.
-
May 24, 2018
Cigna, American Specialty Colluded To Charge Plans: Suit
Cigna and American Specialty Health were hit with a proposed Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action in California federal court on Wednesday, accusing them of colluding to saddle members and plans with the charges American Specialty incurs for processing claims and administering a network on Cigna's behalf.