Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
August 06, 2018
Wagner v. Ashline et al
Case Number:
5:18-cv-00123
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 02, 2021
Attys' Rates Disclosure Doesn't Help Client Win Fee Bid
An auto parts supplier that successfully defended against a suit by a nurse claiming she co-invented its seatbelt patent had its attorney fee motion rejected last week by a federal court, despite the auto company's lawyers at Nelson Mullins disclosing the rates they billed in the case.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login