Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:18-cv-05546
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 24, 2019
Uber Escapes Unfair Competition Suit Brought By Limo Biz
A California federal judge allowed a limousine company to quietly drop a proposed class action accusing Uber of anti-competitive business practices Wednesday, but not before asking for more information to ensure absent plaintiffs weren't getting the short end of the stick.
-
June 21, 2019
Uber Must Face Unfair-Competition Suit For Now
A California federal judge is allowing an anti-competition suit brought by a limousine company against Uber to continue, even though he said it did not sufficiently establish that the court has jurisdiction to consider the matter as a class action.
-
May 30, 2019
Uber Mum On Whether Calif. Agency Can Raise Its Rates
Uber told a California federal judge on Thursday it's exempt from a state anti-competition law as a so-called transportation network company regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission, but couldn't offer a definitive answer when the judge asked whether the agency has the power to raise Uber's rates.
-
April 25, 2019
Limo Co. Fights Uber's Bid To Exit Unfair Competition Suit
A California limousine company told a federal judge Thursday that it has properly laid out class claims alleging Uber wrongly classified its drivers as independent contractors to gain a competitive edge, arguing its suit should remain in federal court.
-
February 01, 2019
Uber Gears Up For An Exit In Unfair Competition Case
Uber Technologies Inc. has asked a judge to toss from federal court an unfair competition suit by a limousine company, saying the suit should be brought in state court because the would-be class members all hail from California.
-
January 09, 2019
Uber Wins DQ Of Opposing Attys In Unfair Competition Case
A California federal judge agreed with Uber Technologies Inc. on Wednesday that a conflict of interest involving its opponents' attorneys at Keller Lenkner LLC is grounds to boot them from a case claiming the ride-hailing company misclassifies its drivers as independent contractors to gain a competitive edge.
-
November 01, 2018
Limo Co. Says Atty Not Conflicted, Slams Uber DQ Bid
A California limousine company suing Uber for misclassifying its drivers as independent contractors to gain a competitive edge told a federal court Wednesday that there's no cause for disqualifying its attorneys at Keller Lenkner LLC for previously collaborating with Uber — but not actually representing Uber — in other matters.
-
October 25, 2018
Uber Says Limo Co.'s Counsel Is Conflicted, Wants DQ
Uber Technologies Inc. on Wednesday asked a California federal court to disqualify Keller Lenkner LLC from representing a proposed class accusing the ride-hailing company of unfairly stealing business from traditional taxi companies, saying one of the firm's attorneys previously worked closely with Uber.
-
October 09, 2018
Limo Co. Says Uber Drivers Are Employees Under Dynamex
A California limousine company told a federal court Friday that the state's newly adopted Dynamex standard for distinguishing between independent contractors and employees will show that Uber Technologies Inc. has misclassified its drivers to get a competitive edge over traditional taxicabs and limousine companies.
-
September 11, 2018
Limo Co. Accuses Uber Of Unfair Prices, Underpaying Drivers
A limousine company has filed a proposed class action against Uber Technologies Inc. in California federal court alleging that the ride-sharing service has unfairly stolen business from traditional cab companies by low-balling its drivers' wages and unfairly steering clear of the required costs of doing business.