Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

FUENTES v. JIFFY LUBE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

  1. June 05, 2019

    Jiffy Lube Says Domino's No-Poach Ruling Does Not Apply

    Jiffy Lube has told a Pennsylvania federal court that a recent ruling in a suit challenging no-poach provisions in Domino's pizza chain's franchise agreements is not applicable to a proposed class action against the car service chain because Domino's competes against its franchisees.

  2. May 16, 2019

    Jiffy Lube Worker Wants No-Poach Case Kept In Pa.

    A former Jiffy Lube worker explained to a Pennsylvania federal court that he filed his suit challenging no-poach provisions in the company's franchise agreements in the district where the pacts prevented him from both "coming and going" and that the case should not be transferred to Texas.

  3. May 08, 2019

    Former Jiffy Lube Worker Says It Can't Slip No-Poach Suit

    Jiffy Lube can't duck a proposed class action just because it puts its allegedly anti-competitive no-poach provision barring recruitment and hiring between sister franchisees into its franchise agreements, a former worker has told a Pennsylvania federal judge.

  4. May 02, 2019

    Jiffy Lube Says No-Poach Suit Belongs In Texas

    Jiffy Lube has told a Pennsylvania federal court that a former worker's suit challenging a no-poach provision in its past franchise agreements has almost no connection to the district where he filed it and should be sent to Texas.

  5. April 16, 2019

    Jiffy Lube Says Its No-Poach Provision Isn't Anti-Competitive

    Jiffy Lube has urged a Pennsylvania federal court to toss a former worker's suit challenging a no-poach provision in its past franchise agreements, saying the provision is above-board and that the company no longer enforces it anyway.

  6. December 03, 2018

    Shell, Jiffy Lube Hit With No-Poach Antitrust Suit

    A former Jiffy Lube worker filed a proposed class action antitrust suit against the chain and its parent company, Royal Dutch Shell PLC, in Pennsylvania federal court Monday, alleging that "no-poaching" agreements between different franchise owners illegally suppress employee wages.