Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
January 03, 2019
Alec Otto v. Nano f/k/a Raiblocks f/k/a Hieusys LLC et al
Case Number:
4:19-cv-00054
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
July 28, 2021
Crypto Developers Seek $701K Sanctions For 'Baseless' Suit
The developers of cryptocurrency Nano sought over $701,000 in attorney fees and costs as a sanction after a token buyer dropped his proposed class action, telling a California federal court that some of the claims lobbed against them had been "legally baseless."
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login