Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

US Coverage

Law360 Authority | Deep News & Analysis

Global Coverage

Law360 Pulse | The Business of Law

Mealeys

MLex

January 03, 2019

Alec Otto v. Nano f/k/a Raiblocks f/k/a Hieusys LLC et al

Track this case

Case Number:

4:19-cv-00054

See also:

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Securities/Commodities

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

Firms

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. July 28, 2021

    Crypto Developers Seek $701K Sanctions For 'Baseless' Suit

    The developers of cryptocurrency Nano sought over $701,000 in attorney fees and costs as a sanction after a token buyer dropped his proposed class action, telling a California federal court that some of the claims lobbed against them had been "legally baseless."

8 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login