Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re: Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
1:19-md-02878
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation, Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- ArentFox Schiff
- ArentFox Schiff LLP
- Berman Tabacco
- Cohen Milstein
- Covington & Burling
- Dugan Law Firm
- Hagens Berman
- Haynes Boone
- Kessler Topaz
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Marshall Halem
- McEldrew Purtell
- Mintz Levin
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Parker Poe
- Pendley Baudin
- Radice Law Firm
- Sperling Kenny
- Sugarman Rogers
- Wexler Boley
- White & Case
Companies
- AstraZeneca PLC
- Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.
- Ranbaxy
- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
- United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 21, 2020
Drug Buyers Say Ranbaxy Can't Have '11th Bite' At Dismissal
Drug buyers urged a Massachusetts federal judge Friday not to let Ranbaxy seek First Circuit relief from multidistrict litigation accusing the company of gaming the generic drug approval system to gain an unfair competitive edge, arguing it's tried and failed repeatedly with the same contentions.
-
January 02, 2020
Ranbaxy Wants 1st Circ. To Settle Generics Antitrust Question
Ranbaxy Inc. wants the First Circuit to take an immediate look at its bid to dismiss a multidistrict suit accusing the company of gaining an unfair edge by improperly securing approval for generic drugs, according to a New Year's Eve filing in Massachusetts federal court.
-
April 22, 2019
4 Firms Seek To Lead Ranbaxy Antitrust MDL In Boston
A quartet of firms — Hagens Berman, Hilliard & Shadowen, Lowey Dannenberg and The Dugan Law Firm — hope to co-lead a multidistrict litigation in Massachusetts federal court Monday that accuses pharmaceutical company Ranbaxy of gaining an unfair competitive advantage by improperly securing approval for generic drugs.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →