Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Siva v. American Board of Radiology
Case Number:
1:19-cv-01407
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
November 20, 2019
Radiology Board Gets Antitrust Suit Zapped
An Illinois federal judge has tossed an antitrust suit against the American Board of Radiology, holding that the organization didn't illegally tie its initial board certification for radiology physicians to a continuous certification program because the two are simply one "multi-stage process" in which tying claims are impossible.
-
June 28, 2019
Radiology Board Wants Competition Curbing Suit Tossed
The American Board of Radiology on Thursday asked an Illinois federal court to toss claims that its initial board certification for radiology physicians and continuous certification program are anti-competitive, arguing that maintaining certification is a continuation of an existing product and not a tying of two separate products.
-
February 27, 2019
American Radiology Board Accused Of Curbing Competition
A radiologist accused the American Board of Radiology of anti-competitive conduct by tying its initial board certification for radiology physicians to paying for continuing radiologist certification, according to a proposed class action filed in Illinois federal court Tuesday.