Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Moore v. J.W. Marriott, Jr. et al
Case Number:
8:19-cv-00830
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Derivative Litigation
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 14, 2021
Marriott Beats Shareholder's Data Breach Suit
A Maryland federal judge has tossed claims brought against Marriott International Inc. by a shareholder following a customer data breach, finding he failed to show he owned stock in the hotel giant during the period relevant to his suit brought on the company's behalf.
-
November 20, 2020
Marriott Investor Looks To Save Data Breach Suit
A shareholder is fighting Marriott International Inc.'s bid to toss his lawsuit filed on the hotel giant's behalf in Maryland federal court following a 2018 customer data breach, saying he has successfully argued that most of the company's board members have a personal interest in the suit's outcome.
-
October 06, 2020
Marriott Wants Out Of Shareholders' Data Breach Suits
Marriott International Inc. has urged a Maryland federal court to toss a pair of related shareholder suits purportedly brought on behalf of the hotel giant as it defends itself in multidistrict litigation following a massive 2018 customer data breach, arguing that the investors' "illogical" claims lack merit.