Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
April 05, 2019
Solid 21, Inc. v. Breitling USA, Inc et al
Case Number:
3:19-cv-00514
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
- Hecht Partners
- Hudson Cook
- Lehrman Villegas
- Milano & Wanat
- Norton Rose
- Sheppard Mullin
- Updike Kelly
- Wofsey Rosen
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
September 18, 2024
Breitling Can't Get $1.4M Fee In Jeweler's 'Red Gold' TM Suit
A Connecticut federal judge has rejected a request for $1.48 million in attorney fees by Swiss watchmaker Breitling SA and its American arm after they beat trademark infringement claims brought by a California jeweler, ruling that the claims may have been unsuccessful but that they were "not frivolous."
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login