April 12, 2019

Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

3:19-cv-01988

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Other Fraud

Judge:

Edward M. Chen

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity


Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.


Coverage

  1. July 3, 2019

    Uber Seeks Sanctions Against Argentine Atty, His Counsel

    Uber has urged a California federal court to sanction an Argentine attorney and his legal counsel for filing an amended complaint in the district when it obviously does not belong there, as his dispute actually involves two Dutch units of the ride-hailing company.

1 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS