Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Vianu et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Case Number:
3:19-cv-03602
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
August 25, 2022
Objector Says Deal Lets AT&T Continue Charging Hidden Fees
An AT&T customer has asked a California federal court to toss a proposed $14 million settlement between the phone company and a class of consumers who claimed they were charged an improper fee, arguing that the agreement does not address the core issue of the suit and allows AT&T to keep charging vague fees.
-
August 16, 2022
AT&T 'Bait-And-Switch' Customer Attys Seek $3.5M In Fees
Attorneys who secured a $14 million settlement for a group of AT&T customers claiming they were charged an improper fee asked a California federal court Monday for a $3.5 million cut of the award to cover their legal fees, as well as additional funds to cover litigation expenses.
-
May 11, 2022
AT&T Inks $14M Deal In 'Bait-And-Switch' Wireless Rate Suit
AT&T customers asked a California federal judge Tuesday to greenlight a $14 million deal resolving claims that the telecommunications giant added an "administrative fee" to so-called flat-rate wireless service plans and misleadingly suggested the fee was a legitimate surcharge rather than a scheme to increase monthly rates.
-
June 12, 2020
AT&T Must Face Suit Over 'Bait-And-Switch' Wireless Rates
AT&T must face a proposed class action claiming it adds an "administrative fee" to so-called flat rate wireless-service plans and misleadingly suggests the fee is a legitimate surcharge rather than a scheme to increase monthly rates.
-
March 25, 2020
AT&T Says 'Bait-And-Switch' Wireless Rates Suit Time-Barred
AT&T fired back at a proposed class action in California federal court alleging the telecom giant ensnared customers in a "bait-and-switch" wireless rate scheme, questioning why the plaintiffs renewed their services if they believed wireless service fees were unjustified and why they took nearly seven years to bring the complaint.
-
October 31, 2019
9th Circ.'s Rent-A-Center Decision Casts Shadow On AT&T
A California federal magistrate judge said Thursday she's likely to deny AT&T's bid to arbitrate claims it ensnared customers in a "bait-and-switch" wireless rate scheme based on the Ninth Circuit's recent Rent-A-Center decision, but indicated she might revisit her decision if the circuit court reviews Rent-A-Center en banc.
-
June 21, 2019
AT&T Sued Over 'Bait-And-Switch' Wireless Rate Scheme
Two AT&T customers lodged a proposed class action Thursday accusing the telecom titan of pulling a "bait-and-switch" by promising low wireless rates and then tacking on unexpected fees.