AT&T Must Face Suit Over 'Bait-And-Switch' Wireless Rates

By Julia Arciga (June 12, 2020, 9:34 PM EDT) -- AT&T must face a proposed class action claiming it adds an "administrative fee" to so-called flat rate wireless-service plans and misleadingly suggests the fee is a legitimate surcharge rather than a scheme to increase monthly rates.

In an order filed Thursday, Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler said parts of the carrier's move to dismiss the suit were not valid because Ian Vianu, IIrina Bukchin and the proposed class' claims had standing. AT&T claimed Vianu and Bukchin could not pursue injunctive relief because they are current AT&T customers who are now aware of the fee. But the judge said there was no need for...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!