Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. E.I DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY et al
Case Number:
1:19-cv-14766
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Ballard Spahr
- Bressler Amery
- Chiesa Shahinian
- Cohn Lifland
- Dema Law
- Kelley Drye
- K&L Gates
- McCarter & English
- Meyner & Landis
- Montgomery McCracken
- Norris McLaughlin
- Wilkinson Stekloff
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 08, 2025
Product Liability Cases To Watch In 2nd Half Of 2025
The fate of a $2.5 billion punitive damages award against Ford and looming bench verdicts in the first PFAS trials brought by a state are among the cases that product liability attorneys will be following closely in the second half of 2025.
-
July 07, 2025
Biggest Enviro Cases To Watch In 2025: Midyear Report
Law360 previews the lawsuits environmental attorneys will be watching closely during the second half of 2025, including the Trump administration's challenge to states' efforts to slow climate change, a lawsuit seeking to continue federal funding for climate change projects and product liability cases over forever chemicals in consumer goods.
-
June 09, 2025
'No Question' DuPont Polluted Delaware River, NJ Court Told
New Jersey told a federal judge on Monday that it was clear E.I. du Pont de Nemours discharged "forever chemicals" into the Delaware River, wrapping up the majority of a first-of-its-kind series of bench trials over whether the company is liable for contamination at a longstanding manufacturing facility.
-
May 27, 2025
Expert Says DuPont Knew Of PFAS Risk At NJ Site
A former U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy adviser told a New Jersey federal court on Tuesday that E.I. du Pont de Nemours knew of the risk of "forever chemicals" and failed to disclose that risk to federal and Garden State regulators despite its obligation to do so.
-
May 19, 2025
DuPont And Garden State Clash In PFAS Trial Opener
New Jersey and E.I. du Pont de Nemours were at odds on Monday in federal court over the risks and cleanup of "forever chemical" contamination at a Salem County manufacturing facility, with the state claiming it was intentionally misled and DuPont arguing the state is changing the rules.
-
May 16, 2025
NJ, DuPont To Face Off In Landmark PFAS Trial Series
New Jersey and chemical manufacturing giant E.I. DuPont de Nemours will square off Monday over the contamination at a former Salem County manufacturing facility in a first-of-a-kind series of trials that environmental attorneys expect will impact "forever chemicals" litigation across the country.
-
May 12, 2025
3M Says It'll Pay $285M To End Past, Future NJ PFAS Claims
3M has agreed to shell out $285 million to put to rest environmental claims brought by New Jersey officials over purported PFAS contamination at the Chamber Works manufacturing facility in Salem County as well as statewide claims the Garden State may have in the future, according to an announcement made Monday.
-
March 13, 2025
Judge Hits 'Reset Button' In 3M, DuPont PFAS Cleanup Case
New Jersey's environmental regulators have tried to force EIDP and DuPont Chemours to begin remediation efforts on "forever chemical" contamination at a former facility in Salem County — which is at the center of ongoing litigation — a move that seemingly undermined a federal judge's authority and put in jeopardy a looming May trial date.
-
February 05, 2025
NJ Seeks Jury Trial In PFAS Cleanup Case Against 3M, DuPont
New Jersey officials are fighting back against 3M and DuPont's requests to have a federal bench trial on their environmental claims seeking remediation and restoration cost reimbursement over purported PFAS contamination, arguing that its legal claims are tied to legal remedies that a jury, not a judge, must decide.
-
October 17, 2022
NJ, Counsel Accused Of 'Gaming' Atty Fees In DuPont Suit
A tiny New Jersey township that borders the sprawling former DuPont Chambers Works along the Delaware River moved to intervene Monday in a nearly $950 million federal cleanup suit, seeking to haul part of the case back into state court and pressing for disqualification of an outside counsel.