Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
RideApp, Inc. v. Lyft, Inc.
Case Number:
4:18-cv-07152
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
February 24, 2020
Lyft Loses Fee Bid In Axed Ride-Hailing IP Infringement Suit
A California federal judge denied Lyft's motion for attorney fees in dismissed litigation accusing it of infringing RideApp Inc.'s ride-sharing patent, ruling Monday that RideApp's decision to sue was not exceptional even though the Patent Trial and Appeal Board previously determined its patent's claims were likely invalid as indefinite.
-
October 31, 2019
Lyft Beats Infringement Suit Over Indefinite Ride-Hailing IP
A California federal judge has dismissed litigation accusing Lyft of infringing a retired professor's ride-sharing patent, after the patent claims were invalidated and the inventor conceded his loss.