Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

November 26, 2018

RideApp, Inc. v. Lyft, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

4:18-cv-07152

See also:

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Patent

Judge:

Jon S. Tigar

Firms

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. February 24, 2020

    Lyft Loses Fee Bid In Axed Ride-Hailing IP Infringement Suit

    A California federal judge denied Lyft's motion for attorney fees in dismissed litigation accusing it of infringing RideApp Inc.'s ride-sharing patent, ruling Monday that RideApp's decision to sue was not exceptional even though the Patent Trial and Appeal Board previously determined its patent's claims were likely invalid as indefinite.

1 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!