Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Perks et al v. Activehours, Inc.
Case Number:
5:19-cv-05543
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
March 26, 2021
Earnin Users Get Final OK On $12.5M Deal In Bank Fee Row
A $12.5 million deal between paycheck advance app Earnin and users has received a final stamp of approval in California federal court, resolving claims that the company was unclear about how its service could trigger bank fees.
-
July 28, 2020
Earnin Users Seek OK For $12.5M Settlement Deal
App-based pay advance service Earnin has agreed to pay as much as $12.5 million to end its users' claims that it misled the public about its offerings, hurting consumers who were charged bank fees as a result.