Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In re Wells Fargo & Company Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Case Number:
4:16-cv-05541
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Derivative Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Arguedas Cassman
- Arnold & Porter
- Berger Montague
- Berman Tabacco
- Bernstein Litowitz
- Bottini & Bottini
- Bramson Plutzik
- Ciardi Ciardi
- Clarence Dyer & Cohen
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Ehrlich & Craig
- Farmer Brownstein
- Glancy Prongay
- Goodwin Procter
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute
- Harwood Feffer
- Himmelstein Law Network
- Lieff Cabraser
- Ridley McGreevy
- Robbins LLP
- Saxena White
- Shearman & Sterling
- Shuman Glenn
- Skaggs Faucette
- Springer Ayeni
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Williams & Connolly
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 05, 2021
No Sanctions For Objector In Wells Fargo Fake Account Deal
A California federal judge has declined to sanction an objector to a Wells Fargo settlement over fake accounts after investors accused the objector and his attorneys of extorting $1.75 million from the bank, saying the court won't order disgorgement of a settlement reached in a state court lawsuit.
-
June 16, 2020
Wells Fargo Investors Say Objector 'Extorted' Bank For $1.75M
An objector to the Wells Fargo settlement over fake accounts should be sanctioned along with his attorneys at Ridley McGreevy & Winocur PC and made to repay $1.75 million they "extorted" from the bank, the lead plaintiffs told a California federal court.
-
April 07, 2020
Attys Score $53M In $240M Wells Fargo Fake Account Deal
Lieff Cabraser and Saxena White attorneys representing Wells Fargo & Co. investors in their derivative suit over fake accounts will come away with $52.8 million in fees, a 22% cut of the $240 million settlement they negotiated last year, according to an order issued Tuesday in California federal court.