In re Wells Fargo & Company Shareholder Derivative Litigation

  1. March 05, 2021

    No Sanctions For Objector In Wells Fargo Fake Account Deal

    A California federal judge has declined to sanction an objector to a Wells Fargo settlement over fake accounts after investors accused the objector and his attorneys of extorting $1.75 million from the bank, saying the court won't order disgorgement of a settlement reached in a state court lawsuit.

  2. June 16, 2020

    Wells Fargo Investors Say Objector 'Extorted' Bank For $1.75M

    An objector to the Wells Fargo settlement over fake accounts should be sanctioned along with his attorneys at Ridley McGreevy & Winocur PC and made to repay $1.75 million they "extorted" from the bank, the lead plaintiffs told a California federal court.

  3. April 07, 2020

    Attys Score $53M In $240M Wells Fargo Fake Account Deal

    Lieff Cabraser and Saxena White attorneys representing Wells Fargo & Co. investors in their derivative suit over fake accounts will come away with $52.8 million in fees, a 22% cut of the $240 million settlement they negotiated last year, according to an order issued Tuesday in California federal court.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!