Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection et al v. Consumer Advocacy Center Inc. et al
Case Number:
8:19-cv-01998
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Cohen Williams LLP
- Covington & Burling
- Eanet PC
- FTW Law Group
- Isaacs & Friedberg
- King & Siegel
- McNamara Smith
- Paul Hastings
- Steptoe LLP
- Tusan Law
- Venable LLP
- Waymaker LLP
Government Agencies
-
July 10, 2023
Disbarred Atty To Pay $243M For Student Loan, Crypto Scam
A disbarred attorney who played a prominent role in a student loan scam and hid his cryptocurrency assets from the government during an investigation into those loans must pay $243 million in redress and civil penalties, a California federal judge has ruled.
-
January 10, 2023
Disbarred Atty Found In Contempt For Hiding Crypto Assets
A California federal judge says a disbarred attorney likely hid cryptocurrency assets during a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau investigation of a student loan scam, and found him in contempt of court, ordering him to pay $1,000 per day if he doesn't hand over control of the assets to a receiver.
-
December 08, 2021
Disbarred Atty Can't Ditch CFPB, States' Telemarketing Claims
A California federal judge on Tuesday denied a disbarred attorney's request to exit a suit the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and several state attorneys had launched against him and others over a student debt-relief operation that allegedly raked in tens of millions of dollars in illegal fees.
-
September 08, 2021
CFPB Says Disbarred Atty Misreads Telemarketing Law
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and several states have urged a California federal judge not to dismiss some claims against a disbarred attorney for his alleged involvement in a student debt-relief operation accused of raking in tens of millions of dollars in illegal fees, saying his legal argument for dismissal is inaccurate.
-
August 28, 2020
CFPB, States Settle With 4 In Student Loan Debt-Relief Case
Federal and state authorities have bagged partial settlements in their California federal court case against an alleged student debt-relief operation accused of raking in tens of millions in illegal advance fees, securing largely suspended judgments that include $1 fines from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.