Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

December 18, 2019

Barton-v- Uber Technologies, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

4:19-cv-08228

See also:

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Civil Rights: Jobs

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Phyllis J. Hamilton

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. May 06, 2021

    Judge Changes Mind, Lets Orgs Weigh In On Uber Wage Suit

    A pair of organizations backing Uber drivers can weigh in on a proposed class action by drivers alleging unpaid wages that hinges on whether California's Proposition 22 is retroactive, a federal judge ruled, reversing an earlier decision blocking the groups from filing an amicus brief.

5 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login