Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Troy Stacy Enterprises Inc., et al. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, et al.
Case Number:
1:20-cv-00312
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Baker & Hostetler
- Cooper Elliott
- Daly & Black
- DiCello Levitt
- Freking Myers
- Litchfield Cavo
- Susman Godfrey
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 27, 2021
Cincinnati Insurance Shakes Businesses' Virus Coverage Suit
An Ohio federal judge won't let local businesses in six states score coverage from Cincinnati Insurance Co. for COVID-19-related financial losses, ruling that a loss must be physical and require repair for the policy to kick in.
-
May 05, 2021
Retailers Fight For Coverage In Ohio COVID Class Action
A group of small businesses urged an Ohio federal judge to keep alive their proposed class action seeking coverage for losses from COVID-19 and related government shutdowns, saying that virus particles altered the air and surfaces in their shops.
-
July 07, 2020
Bar Slaps Insurer's Bid To Get Ohio Justices In COVID-19 Row
An Ohio bar and record shop urged a federal judge to reject Cincinnati Insurance Co.'s bid to bring in the Ohio Supreme Court to certify whether COVID-19 causes a physical loss at the heart of the insurer's case, saying the issues don't involve questions of state law but are governed by "universal principles" for interpreting "standardized" insurance terms.