Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
PRATT et al v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES INC
Case Number:
1:20-cv-00295
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 30, 2021
Jails Wiretap Suit Must Claim Bad Intentions, Judge Says
A Maine federal judge on Friday dismissed a putative class action accusing a state telephone contractor of illegally recording calls between attorneys and their jailed clients — but left a path open for the suit if the plaintiffs can allege the contractor intended to illegally surveil them.
-
August 17, 2020
Attys Claim Prosecutors Got Clients' Illegally Tapped Jail Calls
Three defense lawyers have accused a jail phone service in Maine federal court of illegally tapping their calls with inmates and then failing to filter the conversations out of recordings handed over to prosecutors.