Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

April 29, 2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. PHILADELPHIA VISION CENTER et al

Track this case

Case Number:

2:20-cv-02027

Court:

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a))

Judge:

GERALD J. PAPPERT

Firms

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. March 17, 2023

    Philly Vision Center Whistleblower Atty Escapes Conflict DQ

    A federal judge ruled Friday that an attorney can continue representing his client in a whistleblower complaint, even though they were both ordered to pay damages by a state jury for wrongfully using the civil process after a federal court dismissed several of the claims.

2 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login