Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
November 10, 2020
PG&E Corporation et al v. Office of the U.S. Trustee / SF
Case Number:
4:20-cv-07865
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker & Hostetler
- Brown Rudnick
- Cravath Swaine
- Groom Law Group
- Hogan Lovells
- Keller Benvenutti
- MacConaghy & Barnier
- Milbank LLP
- Munger Tolles
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Ropes & Gray
- Weil Gotshal
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 17, 2022
PG&E Investors' $250M Chapter 11 Claim Is Again Rebuffed
A California federal judge has rejected an appeal by Pacific Gas & Electric investors who argue they are owed $250 million because the utility did not live up to a pledge to use its "best efforts" to secure them stock purchase rights in exchange for their support of its Chapter 11 plan.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login