Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

January 21, 2021

Amin et al v. Subway Restaurants, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

4:21-cv-00498

See also:

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Other Fraud

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Jon S. Tigar

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. August 07, 2023

    Subway Can't Get Sanctions In Dropped '100% Tuna' Fight

    A California federal judge tossed a proposed class action alleging Subway's 100% tuna claim is misleading, but refused to sanction counsel representing the lead plaintiff, finding that although her attorneys' alleged discovery misconduct was "blameworthy," the sandwich chain failed to show the consumer recklessly pursued her claims.

5 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login