Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Schei et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:21-cv-00718
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 16, 2025
AT&T Gets $450M 'Twinning' Patent Suit Tossed Again
A New York federal judge has held that it is only fitting that she rule twice on a motion to dismiss a $450 million patent lawsuit against AT&T over so-called twinning phone technology, deciding yet again that the patent is not inventive enough to be worth anything.
-
July 26, 2022
Patent Co. Says AT&T Can't Ax $450M Number-Sharing IP Row
Patent-holding company Network Apps has urged a New York federal judge to rebuff AT&T's bid to escape infringement litigation over phone number-sharing technology, saying the telecommunications giant is oversimplifying the claimed invention.
-
June 27, 2022
AT&T Says $450M Phone Sharing IP Suit Is 6 Years Too Late
AT&T Inc. has urged a New York federal judge to reject a patent-holding company's $450 million infringement suit over phone number sharing technology, arguing that the suit is too stale and that the patent covers nothing more than an abstract idea.
-
March 30, 2022
AT&T Can't DQ Ex-BigLaw Attys From $450M IP Case
A New York federal judge on Wednesday refused to bar a former Baker Botts LLP lawyer and two former Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP attorneys from working on a $450 million patent case against AT&T.
-
August 02, 2021
Tech Co. Fights AT&T Bid To Disqualify Its Ex-BigLaw Attys
AT&T can't stop a former Baker Botts LLP lawyer and two ex-Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP attorneys from working on a $450 million patent case against it just because they provided it legal services years before the disputed patent was ever crafted, a New York federal court heard.
-
June 30, 2021
AT&T Wants Ex-BigLaw Attys DQ'd From $450M Patent Case
AT&T on Tuesday asked a New York federal court to disqualify a former Baker Botts attorney and two former Akin Gump attorneys from representing a company that hit the telecom giant with a $450 million patent infringement suit, arguing that the lawyers previously provided extensive legal services for AT&T.