NUNES v. WP COMPANY LLC et al

Track this case

Case Number:

1:21-cv-00506

Court:

District Of Columbia

Nature of Suit:

Assault Libel & Slander

Judge:

Carl J. Nichols

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. April 02, 2024

    DC Judge Grapples With Malice Claim In Nunes' WaPo Suit

    A D.C. federal judge on Tuesday questioned whether former California Rep. Devin Nunes had shown The Washington Post acted with actual malice in publishing a 2020 article that discussed the congressman, as the judge weighed the newspaper's bid for summary judgment in defamation litigation brought by Nunes.

  2. November 09, 2023

    Devin Nunes Wants WaPo's 'Hyperbolic' Sanctions Bid Tossed

    Former California Rep. Devin Nunes hit back against The Washington Post's accusation he wiped evidence in his defamation suit against the newspaper in D.C. federal court, saying despite "hyperbolic rhetoric," the paper fails to back up its claims that the representative destroyed communications relevant to discovery.

  3. October 13, 2023

    WaPo Says Devin Nunes Wiped Evidence In Sanctions Bid

    The Washington Post urged a D.C. federal judge to sanction former California Rep. Devin Nunes for allegedly wiping evidence in his defamation suit against the newspaper over a November 2020 article that discussed the representative.

  4. August 11, 2021

    WaPo Trims But Can't Beat Rep. Nunes' Defamation Suit

    A D.C. federal judge refused Wednesday to toss California Rep. Devin Nunes' suit against the Washington Post over a November 2020 article that discussed the congressman, trimming a negligence claim but finding that although "the question is a close one," Nunes' defamation claim can proceed.

  5. May 18, 2021

    Libel Suit Judge Skeptical Of Rep. Nunes' And WaPo's Claims

    A D.C. federal judge hearing the defamation suit brought by California Republican Rep. Devin Nunes against The Washington Post on Tuesday wrestled with whether seeming small errors in the newspaper's reporting were the result of a reckless disregard for the truth as the lawmaker contends.