Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Charles Larry Crews, Jr. v. Rivian Automotive, Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:22-cv-01524
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Berger Montague
- Block & Leviton
- Bragar Eagel
- Freshfields
- Glancy Prongay
- Johnson Fistel
- Kessler Topaz
- Larson LLP
- Levi & Korsinsky
- Lieff Cabraser
- Milberg Coleman
- Motley Rice
- Orrick Herrington
- Pomerantz LLP
- Robbins Geller
- Rosen Law Firm PA
- Zimmerman Reed
Companies
- Academy Securities Inc.
- Allen & Company LLC
- Barclays PLC
- Blaylock Van LLC
- Cabrera Capital Markets LLC
- Deutsche Bank AG
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- Loop Capital Markets LLC
- Mizuho Financial Group Inc.
- Mizuho Securities Co. Ltd.
- Morgan Stanley
- Nomura Holdings Inc.
- Piper Sandler Cos.
- RBC Capital Markets
- Rivian Automotive LLC
- Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc.
- The Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
- Wedbush Securities Inc.
- Wells Fargo & Co.
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 10, 2024
Rivian's Cert. Oppo Not How 'Real World Works,' Judge Says
A California federal judge told Rivian's attorney Friday that his arguments opposing class certification for investors alleging the carmaker misled them on material costs appeared to say that unless a company practically admits fraud in a disclosure it's not a "corrective" disclosure, but "that is not how the real world works."
-
March 01, 2024
EV Maker Rivian Rips Investors' Class Cert. Bid In Fraud Suit
Investors alleging Rivian Automotive Inc. underpriced its electric vehicles and misrepresented its profitability ahead of a blockbuster 2021 initial public offering cannot certify their class with zero evidence, weak fraud-on-the-market theories and troubling litigation tactics, Rivian argued in a California federal court filing Thursday.
-
December 04, 2023
Rivian Investors Seek Class Cert. In Suit Against EV Maker
Investors of electric vehicle manufacturer Rivian Automotive Inc. have asked a California federal judge to certify their proposed class in a securities class action alleging Rivian underpriced its electric vehicles and misled investors ahead of a blockbuster 2021 initial public offering.
-
July 31, 2023
EV Maker Rivian, Investors Referred To Private Mediation
A California federal judge on Monday referred a proposed class of investors and Rivian Automotive Inc. to private mediation in a lawsuit alleging Rivian underpriced its electric vehicles and misled investors ahead of a blockbuster 2021 initial public offering.
-
July 05, 2023
EV Maker Rivian Can't Ditch Investor Fraud Suit Over IPO
A California federal judge says Rivian Automotive Inc. must face a securities fraud suit alleging it underpriced its electric vehicles and knowingly misled investors ahead of its blockbuster 2021 initial public offering about the company's profitability.
-
February 17, 2023
Electric Car Co. Rivian Puts Brakes On Investor Suit, For Now
A California federal judge on Thursday ruled Rivian Automotive investors haven't shown the electric automaker hid that it would need to raise prices shortly after its initial public offering, throwing out the proposed securities class action, but giving the investors time to tweak their complaint.
-
March 08, 2022
Electric Car Maker Rivian Accused Of Misleading Investors
Electric vehicle maker Rivian Automotive was hit on Monday with a proposed securities class action in California federal court alleging it didn't tell investors that it would need to raise prices on its vehicles shortly after its initial public offering, sinking its share price.