Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Arcell et al v. Google LLC et al
Case Number:
3:22-cv-02499
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Alioto Law Firm
- Latham & Watkins
- Law Offices of Lawrence G. Papale
- Law Offices of Lingel H. Winters
- Nedeau Law Firm
- Skadden Arps
- Veen Firm
- Williams & Connolly
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 23, 2024
Google-Apple Search Pact Antitrust Suit Faces Doubtful Judge
A California federal judge overseeing an antitrust suit over Google and Apple's agreement making Google the default iPhone search engine appeared open to the tech giants' dismissal motion Tuesday, telling consumers, "I don't see a lot of factual allegations to support" that competitors are being shut out of the market.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →