Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Los Padres Forestwatch et al v. United States Forest Service et al
Case Number:
2:22-cv-02781
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 20, 2023
Forest Service Gets Win In Tree-Thinning Fight In Los Padres
A California federal judge is upholding the U.S. Forest Service's decision to approve a 755-acre forest-thinning project in the state's Los Padres National Forest, granting the agency's bid for summary judgment and ending a challenge from a half-dozen environmental groups and the holding company for outdoor gear retailer Patagonia.
-
March 13, 2023
Patagonia, Enviros Say Calif. Forest Plans Needed Review
Conservation groups, including the holding company for outdoor clothier Patagonia, urged a California federal judge to find that a government tree-clearing project in the Golden State's Los Padres National Forest deserved broader environmental review.
-
April 27, 2022
Trio Of Calif. Suits Fight Federal Logging Project Decisions
Patagonia's holding company, six environmental groups and two municipalities on Wednesday asked a California federal court to vacate federal authorizations for a Los Padres National Forest logging project, arguing that a technicality that allows certain projects to bypass environmental review was wrongfully applied.