Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

May 31, 2022

PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al

Track this case

Case Number:

1:22-cv-01106

Court:

Indiana Southern

Nature of Suit:

791(Labor: E.R.I.S.A.)

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. February 22, 2023

    Worker Must Pay For 'Egregious' Claim, Eli Lilly Says

    A worker should have to cover the costs Eli Lilly incurred defending her unsubstantiated accusation that the pharmaceutical giant improperly took money from its 401(k) plan, the company told a federal court.

2 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login