Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Aaron Munoz v. Alorica, Inc. et al
Case Number:
8:22-cv-01856
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Christina Humphrey Law
- Constangy Brooks
- Groom Law Group
- Jackson Lewis PC
- Keesal Young
- McGuireWoods
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Tower Legal Group
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 22, 2025
Alorica 401(k) Participants Win ERISA Class Cert.
A California federal judge agreed Monday to certify a class of participants in business process company Alorica's 401(k) plan who alleged that high fees and poorly performing investments violated federal benefits law, holding that the proposed 4,000-member group had enough in common to warrant the court's signoff.
-
November 12, 2024
Ex-Alorica Employees Ask For Class Status In 401(k) Fee Suit
Former Alorica Inc. employees urged a California federal court to sign off on a 4,000-member class in their lawsuit claiming the business process outsourcing company loaded its 401(k) plan with high costs and underperforming investment options.
-
June 04, 2024
Morgan Stanley Unit Seeks Exit From Alorica 401(k) Fee Suit
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC has asked to be dismissed from a suit alleging mismanagement of a retirement savings plan for employees of business processing outsourcing service provider Alorica Inc., arguing in California federal court that it had been "improperly lumped" into a revision of the suit 17 months after the matter was originally filed.