Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Hughes et al v. Apple, Inc.
Case Number:
3:22-cv-07668
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 18, 2024
Apple Gets Some AirTag Stalking Claims Tossed, For Now
The California federal judge overseeing a proposed class action accusing Apple of failing to safeguard its AirTag tracking device from being abused by stalkers on Monday tossed product liability claims brought by consumers outside of California, saying Golden State law calls for the "place of the wrong" to take precedence.
-
March 22, 2024
Apple AirTag Judge Open To Injunctive Cert. In Stalking Suit
A California federal judge overseeing claims that Apple Inc. failed to safeguard its AirTag tracking device from being abused by stalkers said Friday it's "exceedingly unlikely" a proposed damages class will be certified, but a proposed class seeking injunctive relief is likely to snag certification, at least on some claims.
-
March 18, 2024
Apple Beats Most Claims In AirTag Stalking Suit, For Now
A California federal judge has dismissed the majority of a proposed class action accusing Apple of not doing enough to safeguard its AirTag tracking device from being abused by stalkers, saying that apart from a few negligence and product liability claims under Golden State law, the rest need to be reworked.
-
December 06, 2022
Apple's AirTag Is Stalkers' 'Weapon Of Choice,' Victims Say
Apple's AirTag has become the "weapon of choice" of stalkers to track their victims, but that hasn't stopped the tech company from touting the product as "stalker proof" and ignoring the concerns of people at risk of abuse, according to a proposed class action filed Monday in California federal court.