Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
County of Multnomah v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
Case Number:
3:23-cv-01213
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Real Property Property Liability
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Baker Botts
- Ballard Spahr
- Barg Singer
- Brownstein Rask
- Bullivant Houser
- Davis Rothwell
- Dowd Bennett
- Dunn Carney
- Dwyer Williams
- Gibson Dunn
- Holland & Knight
- Hunton Andrews
- Kellogg Hansen
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- K&L Gates
- Lindsay Hart
- McDermott Weaver
- McGuireWoods
- Miller Nash LLP
- Morgan Lewis
- Paul Weiss
- Perkins Coie
- Pitzer Law
- Quinn Emanuel
- Schwabe Williamson
- Simon Greenstone
- Snell & Wilmer
- Stinson LLP
- Stoel Rives
- Susman Godfrey
- Thomas Coon Newton & Frost
- West Webb Allbritton & Gentry
- WilmerHale
- Worthington & Caron
Companies
- American Petroleum Institute Inc.
- BP PLC
- Chevron Corp.
- ConocoPhillips Co.
- Exxon Mobil Corp.
- Koch Inc.
- Marathon Oil Corp.
- Marathon Petroleum Corp.
- Motiva Enterprises LLC
- Occidental Petroleum Corp.
- Peabody Energy Corp.
- Shell PLC
- TotalEnergies SE
- Valero Energy Corp.
- Western States Petroleum Association
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 11, 2024
Ore. County Climate Suit Sent To State Court
An Oregon federal judge sent Multnomah County's climate change lawsuit against Chevron, Exxon Mobil Corp. and other fossil fuel companies back to state court, adopting a magistrate judge's findings rejecting arguments the complaint was fraudulently crafted to evade federal jurisdiction.
-
April 11, 2024
Judge Recommends State Court For Ore. County Climate Suit
A federal magistrate judge has said an Oregon county's climate change lawsuit against Chevron, Exxon Mobil and other fossil fuel companies should be sent back to state court, rejecting arguments that the complaint was fraudulently crafted to evade federal jurisdiction.
-
October 03, 2023
Ore. County Says Climate Suit Belongs In State Court
An Oregon county urged a federal judge to send its climate change suit against a slew of fossil fuel companies back to state court, asserting the company responsible for removing the case to federal court, Chevron Corp., has continually espoused the same argument to no avail.