Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Samuels v. Lido DAO et al
Case Number:
3:23-cv-06492
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Brown Rudnick
- Fairmark Partners LLP
- Gerstein Harrow
- Latham & Watkins
- London & Naor
- Morrison Cohen
- Sheppard Mullin
- Skadden Arps
- Susman Godfrey
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 09, 2025
Susman Godfrey Vies To Help Lead Crypto DAO Suit
Susman Godfrey LLP has asked a federal judge in California to allow it to serve as co-lead counsel in an investor lawsuit against decentralized autonomous organization Lido DAO and its large institutional investors over allegedly unregistered securities sold in the form of crypto tokens.
-
November 19, 2024
Calif. Judge Says Crypto DAOs Are Entities That Can Be Sued
A California federal judge has held that decentralized autonomous organizations and their governing members can indeed be sued, refusing to throw out a Golden State cryptocurrency investor's suit against Lido DAO that the judge said presents "several new and important questions" about liability in the crypto world.