Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
In re Wells Fargo Unauthorized Products Litigation
Case Number:
3:24-cv-01223
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arias Sanguinetti
- Blood Hurst
- Dann Law Firm
- Evangelista Worley
- Kazerouni Law Group
- Keller Rohrback
- Kopelowitz Ostrow
- McGuireWoods
- Milberg Coleman
- Sterlington PLLC
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 25, 2024
Wells Fargo Says Sham Enrollment Claims Are Too Old
A proposed class's claims accusing Wells Fargo of attempting to shortchange customers after surreptitiously signing them up for unwanted financial products are time-barred, vague and "implausible," and therefore cannot proceed, the bank told a California federal court.
-
February 29, 2024
Wells Fargo Trying To Paper Over Sham Sign-Ups, Suit Says
Wells Fargo was hit Thursday in San Francisco federal court with a class action complaint that alleges the bank surreptitiously enrolled consumers in unwanted account products for years, and is now trying to buy them off on the cheap with murky offers of compensation.