Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In re: Passenger Vehicle Replacement Tires Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
5:24-md-03107
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Ahdoot & Wolfson
- Alston & Bird
- Burns Charest
- Carpenter Lipps
- Collins Einhorn
- Cotchett Pitre
- Covington & Burling
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- DiCello Levitt
- DLA Piper
- Girard Sharp
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hanna Campbell & Powell
- Haynsworth Sinkler
- Jones Day
- Latham & Watkins
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Morgan Lewis
- Morganstern MacAdams
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Plakas Mannos
- Robins Kaplan
- Shinder Cantor
- Steven Williams Law
- Taft Stettinius
- Thompson Hine
- Vorys
- Weil Gotshal
- White & Case
- Wilson Elser
- Wilson Sonsini
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Zoll & Kranz
- Zwerling Schachter
Companies
- Bridgestone Corp.
- Continental AG
- Hankook Tire Co. Ltd
- Kumho Tire Co. Inc.
- Michelin Group
- Nokian Tyres PLC
- Pirelli & Co.
- Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd.
- The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
- Yokohama Rubber Co. Ltd.
- Yokohama Tire Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 21, 2025
Tire Cos. Resist Bid To Add EU Probe Info to Price-Hike Suit
Tire manufacturers including Bridgestone, Goodyear and Michelin are urging an Ohio federal court not to let buyers update their antitrust case accusing the companies of fixing prices to include additional allegations stemming from a European Commission investigation.
-
February 26, 2025
COVID Plausible Cause For Tire Price Hikes, Judge Says
Consumers, dealerships and other tire purchasers will need more than claims of pretextual explanations for price hikes by Bridgestone, Goodyear, Michelin and other producers after an Ohio federal judge dismissed the "unsupported conclusion" that the pandemic doesn't explain their claims of consolidated price fixing.