In Re: Capital One 360 Savings Account Interest Rate Litigation

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

1:24-md-03111

Court:

Virginia Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Multi-district Litigation, Class Action

Judge:

David J. Novak

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. January 12, 2026

    Capital One's Revised $425M Rate Deal Gets Judge's Initial OK

    A Virginia federal judge Monday preliminarily approved a revised settlement with Capital One over claims the bank deceptively advertised its 360 Savings accounts, with the new deal more than doubling the value of an earlier proposed deal the judge had refused to approve.

  2. November 06, 2025

    Capital One's $425M Rate Deal Rejected Over Low Payouts

    A Virginia federal judge Thursday refused to sign off on Capital One's proposed $425 million settlement with customers accusing the bank of deceptively advertising its 360 Savings accounts, finding that the customers deserve "significantly greater relief" than what's outlined in the deal.

  3. September 24, 2025

    AGs Slam Capital One's $425M Deal As Unfair To Consumers

    New York Attorney General Letitia James and 17 other attorneys general are opposing a proposed $425 million settlement between Capital One and a putative consumer class alleging the bank deceptively advertised its 360 Savings accounts, telling a Virginia federal court the deal "fails to adequately redress" the harms caused by the scheme.

  4. May 16, 2025

    Capital One Inks $425M Deal In Savers' 'High-Interest' Suit

    Capital One has agreed to pay $425 million to put to rest a proposed class action alleging that it deceptively advertised its 360 Savings accounts as high-interest savings products, according to a joint notice filed Friday in Virginia federal court.

  5. November 14, 2024

    Capital One Must Face Savers' Suit Over 'High-Interest' Claims

    A Virginia federal judge has slightly trimmed a consolidated litigation accusing Capital One NA of deceptively advertising its 360 Savings accounts as high-interest savings products and separately denied the bank its bid for a bench trial instead of a jury trial on the remaining claims.