Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC
Case Number:
3:24-cv-05417
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Cooley LLP
- Cowan DeBaets
- Edelson PC
- Fairmark Partners LLP
- Freedman Normand
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Kwun Bhansali
- Latham & Watkins
- Lieff Cabraser
- Mintz & Gold
- Morrison & Foerster
- Oppenheim & Zebrak
- Susman Godfrey
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 13, 2025
Anthropic Judge Rips Opt-Out Law Firm As 'Quick Buck' Ploy
A California federal judge on Thursday blasted Arizona law firm ClaimsHero Holdings LLC for encouraging authors to opt out of Anthropic PBC's $1.5 billion deal to end copyright infringement claims, saying it looks like the firm is "trying to trick people" for a "quick buck."
-
November 05, 2025
Anthropic Deal Opt-Outs May Have Been 'Lured,' Authors Say
Authors who struck a landmark $1.5 billion settlement with Anthropic PBC to resolve their copyright infringement class action told a California federal judge Tuesday that an Arizona law firm is tricking class members into opting out of the deal through an "aggressive social media advertising campaign."
-
September 25, 2025
Anthropic Judge Greenlights 'Historic' $1.5B Copyright Deal
A California federal judge on Thursday preliminarily approved a $1.5 billion deal Anthropic PBC struck with authors to end their copyright class action against the artificial intelligence developer, with counsel for the plaintiffs calling it a "historic settlement" that will result in the "largest copyright recovery of all time."
-
September 22, 2025
Judge Gets More Details On Proposed $1.5B Anthropic IP Deal
Authors who have inked a proposed $1.5 billion deal to end their copyright class action against artificial intelligence developer Anthropic PBC are saying they have worked out all the issues a California federal judge pointed out when he initially declined to give the deal approval.
-
September 08, 2025
'Disappointed' Alsup Wants More Info On $1.5B Anthropic Deal
U.S. District Judge William Alsup has declined to sign off on Anthropic's proposed $1.5 billion settlement with authors accusing the artificial intelligence developer of copyright infringement, saying he's "disappointed that counsel have left important questions" unanswered and instructing the parties to provide more information by the end of the month.
-
September 05, 2025
Anthropic Agrees To Pay $1.5B To Settle AI Copyright Fight
Leading artificial intelligence developer Anthropic has agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a case brought by a group of authors who accused the company of illegally using their works to train its flagship large language model, the authors told a California federal court on Friday.
-
August 26, 2025
Anthropic, Authors Reach Deal In AI Copyright Cases
Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic said Tuesday it has inked a deal to end copyright litigation from authors who allege that their works were illegally obtained to train the company's large language model, Claude.
-
August 14, 2025
Anthropic Asks 9th Circ. To Halt AI Copyright Trial For Appeal
Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic has urged the Ninth Circuit to overturn a California federal judge's refusal to delay trial in a copyright lawsuit from authors who allege their works were illegally obtained to train the company's large language model, Claude.
-
August 11, 2025
AI Firm Anthropic Can't Get Pause For Early Fair Use Appeal
A California federal judge on Monday denied a request from artificial intelligence firm Anthropic to pause a case over its use of books to train its large language model so it could appeal a ruling saying a jury would decide whether damages were warranted for the company's use of pirated works.
-
July 29, 2025
Authors Fight Anthropic's Appeal Of Fair Use Ruling
Authors battling artificial intelligence firm Anthropic over its use of their books to train a large language model have urged a California federal judge to disallow a mid-case appeal of his ruling that Anthropic could use books it bought legally, but not the millions it purportedly lifted from online libraries of pirated works.