Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
August 19, 2024
Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC
Case Number:
3:24-cv-05417
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Cooley LLP
- Cowan DeBaets
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Kwun Bhansali
- Latham & Watkins
- Lieff Cabraser
- Mintz & Gold
- Morrison & Foerster
- Susman Godfrey
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
August 11, 2025
AI Firm Anthropic Can't Get Pause For Early Fair Use Appeal
A California federal judge on Monday denied a request from artificial intelligence firm Anthropic to pause a case over its use of books to train its large language model so it could appeal a ruling saying a jury would decide whether damages were warranted for the company's use of pirated works.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login