The latest iteration of an investor suit claiming Sunrun Inc. fudged customer cancellation numbers to keep its stock afloat fared no better than the first two versions, a federal judge in California found Thursday in a pithy two-page opinion chucking the complaint.
A Connecticut federal judge has signed off on a $54 million settlement between indirect purchasers of stroke prevention medicine Aggrenox and drugmakers Teva Pharmaceutical and Boehringer Ingelheim to end allegations the companies blocked generic alternatives to the drug from coming to the market.
A California federal judge on Thursday laid the ground rules for a Sept. 4 bench trial over allegations the NCAA illegally prevents athletes from being paid beyond their scholarships, requiring the parties to cut down over 2,000 exhibits, restricting layman witnesses and setting time limits on arguments.
An attorney who reportedly tried to trick Midland Credit Management Inc. into violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and was sanctioned for bringing frivolous litigation over $131 lost his appeal Thursday when the Second Circuit affirmed a lower court decision tossing the suit.
The guardian of the minor daughter of the late New England Patriots tight end Aaron Hernandez asked a Pennsylvania federal court Wednesday to reverse the decision to join her claims to the NFL concussion multidistrict litigation, saying her claims have a different basis than the MDL ones.
A Louisiana federal judge on Wednesday signed off on a deal in multidistrict litigation over allegedly defective drywall products from China that sends $2 million to a group of consumers following the resolution of claims initially bought by a drywall installer against a Chinese manufacturer.
A Utah federal judge has ordered nearly $10.3 million in restitution and a $681,000 civil penalty against an Estonian foreign exchange trader that has yet to make a showing in the suit accusing it of conducting unregistered trades with U.S. customers, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced Thursday.
The judge presiding over the bankruptcy case for General Motors LLC’s predecessor said Thursday he’s not yet decided on whether class certification is needed for him to approve a proposed Chapter 11 settlement over legacy ignition switch lawsuits that could possibly cost the carmaker $1 billion in new stock.
A Massachusetts federal judge on Thursday allowed a former finance employee to pursue claims that MFS Investment Management put nearly every dollar of its workers’ retirement savings into the company’s own mutual funds, passing up nonproprietary alternatives to the participants’ detriment since 2011.
Ford Motor Co. and auto parts supplier Robert Bosch LLC rebuked a proposed Michigan class action alleging they rigged 500,000 heavy-duty trucks to cheat emissions tests, saying Wednesday the vehicle owners’ unsubstantiated racketeering and fraud claims based on contrived road tests won’t hold up in court.
RBS Citizens Bank NA on Thursday urged the Third Circuit to decertify a collective action over allegedly unpaid overtime for mortgage loan officers, arguing that the differing accounts provided by the employees defeated their claims of an unwritten policy encouraging workers to toil off the clock.
Medtronic Inc. investors asked a Minnesota federal judge on Wednesday for initial approval of a $43 million settlement they reached with the medical device maker after five years of litigation involving claims it manipulated studies for a bone graft product to drive up share prices.
A Massachusetts federal judge greenlighted more than $40 million in attorneys’ fees that consumers, pharmacies and health plans racked up during four years of multidistrict litigation and a three-week trial alleging several U.S. drugmakers colluded to delay a generic alternative to brand-name acne medication Solodyn.
A debt collection company said Wednesday that a data-entry glitch that allegedly renewed thousands of debts associated with a Pennsylvania hospital was a “bona fide error” and the customers who claimed it dinged their credit scores weren’t entitled to summary judgment in a class action.
Irico Group and a subsidiary on Wednesday asked a California federal court to dismiss them from long-running litigation that claims they participated in a conspiracy to fix prices for cathode ray tubes, saying they should be granted sovereign immunity because they are controlled by the Chinese state.
Software provider CDK Global LLC asked an Illinois federal court on Wednesday to either compel arbitration or dismiss claims against it by the car dealership class in multidistrict litigation alleging it monopolized access to data in software licensed to car dealerships, saying the dealers don’t have standing as indirect purchasers of applications that utilize the data.
Truck driver Dominic Oliveira urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to reject New Prime Inc.’s bid to have the justices compel arbitration in his class action alleging the trucking company failed to pay independent contractor truck-driver apprentices a proper minimum wage, insisting the Federal Arbitration Act doesn’t apply here.
A California federal judge has tossed a proposed class action alleging that AT&T Inc. wrongly saddled its $34 billion 401(k) plan with excessive costs and fees, finding the current and former employees didn’t demonstrate that they brought their claims in time.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup on Thursday approved a $125 million deal ending securities class actions against LendingClub Corp., but said he couldn't bless class counsel's "unbelievable" bid for $16 million in attorneys' fees because the request was so vague he "may have to bring in one of those people with the green eyeshade."
An AT&T Inc. pension plan has been hit with a proposed class action in New York federal court from two former employees who alleged they were wrongfully denied retroactive early retirement benefits they accrued under an amendment to the plan.
Law professor Nathalie Martin's new book, "Lawyering From the Inside Out: Learning Professional Development Through Mindfulness and Emotional Intelligence," can be of value to any lawyer aiming to achieve greater productivity, relieve the stress of the legal profession and focus on goals, says U.S. District Chief Judge Denise Page Hood of the Eastern District of Michigan.
In recent years, no-poach agreements have become subject to close scrutiny both by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division and private class action plaintiffs. These cases show that violations of federal antitrust laws can have an immediate and real impact on ordinary people and their livelihoods, say Robin van der Meulen and Brian Morrison of Labaton Sucharow LLP.
The blockbuster e-discovery cases, with big sanctions and bigger controversies, have been few and far between this year. But that doesn’t mean the legal questions around e-discovery have been answered. Let’s take a closer look at three cases worthy of our attention, says Casey Sullivan, an attorney at discovery technology provider Logikcull.
A Florida magistrate judge's finding last month that tokens issued and sold by technology startup Centra Tech are investment contracts could serve as a road map for the evaluation of token sales in other cases, say attorneys with DLA Piper.
Later this week, Harvard Law students will begin bidding on interview slots with the nation’s top law firms. Our institutions owe it to their students not only to require firms to disclose mandatory arbitration provisions in new associate contracts, but also to bar employers from on-campus recruiting if they require these provisions, says Isabel Finley, a third-year student at Harvard Law School and president of the Harvard Women’s Law Association.
Following the Eleventh Circuit's decision in Mickles v. Country Club Inc., defeating conditional certification will not result in automatic dismissal without prejudice of early opt-ins in collective action cases, say Juan Enjamio and Anna Lazarus of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP.
Many legal teams involved in cross-border matters still hesitate to use technology assisted review, questioning its ability to handle non-English document collections. However, with the proper expertise, modern TAR can be used with any language, including challenging Asian languages, say John Tredennick and David Sannar of Catalyst Repository Systems.
Last month, the Fourth Circuit announced that it would not revive the the Lipitor multidistrict litigation. The court's decision was a welcome affirmation that, in excluding the plaintiffs' expert witnesses and weak testimony on causation, the MDL court had done exactly what it was supposed to, says Eric Alexander of Reed Smith LLP.
A significant number of the securities class actions filed in the first half of 2018 were merger objection lawsuits, but the number of traditional filings alone was well above historical levels. If this pace continues, 2018 filings would approach last year’s elevated total, says Kevin LaCroix of RT ProExec.
In Maldonado v. Epsilon Plastics, a California appeals court recently recognized the inherent unfairness of penalizing California employers twice for a single payroll error, holding that inaccurate wage statements alone do not justify penalties, say Gilbert Tsai & Josue Aparcio of Hanson Bridgett LLP.